As a learning Experience Designer, my expertise is not the content. I work closely with Subject Matter Experts, all Ph.D. holders, and experts in their fields. However, this is always debatable with senior management, who believe content/subject review is part of what I do. So, my question is: what scientific methods can I include in the program development process that ensures the quality of the content provided? Is there a way to implement content quality assurance that is agile and not time-consuming?
Hi @NaglaaHassan ,
I feed ChatGPT your question as a prompt and this is what it suggested as option 1.
Here are some scientific methods you can include in the program development process to ensure the quality of the content provided:
User Testing: Conduct user testing by selecting a representative sample of your target audience to provide feedback on the content. This can help ensure that the content is relevant and valuable to the end-users.
Expert Review: Conduct an expert review of the content by subject matter experts to ensure that the information provided is accurate and up-to-date.
Peer Review: Conduct a peer review by having other professionals review the content to ensure that it meets the quality standards of your industry.
Pilot Testing: Pilot testing involves testing the program with a small group of users to identify any issues and make necessary adjustments before launching it to a wider audience.
Data Analysis: Analyze data from previous programs or from similar programs to identify patterns, trends, and insights that can be used to improve the quality of the content.
To implement content quality assurance that is agile and not time-consuming, you can:
Prioritize: Prioritize the most important aspects of the content that need to be reviewed and focus on those first.
Use Automated Tools: Use automated tools such as spell-checkers, grammar checkers, and plagiarism checkers to quickly identify errors and inconsistencies in the content.
Establish Standards: Establish clear quality standards and guidelines for the content development process to ensure that everyone involved in the process is on the same page.
Conduct Frequent Reviews: Conduct frequent reviews throughout the development process to catch errors early and avoid time-consuming revisions later on.
Streamline the Process: Streamline the content development process by breaking it down into smaller, more manageable tasks and delegating responsibilities to different team members.
By incorporating these scientific methods and implementing an agile approach to content quality assurance, you can ensure that the program development process is efficient, effective, and produces high-quality content.
Love the options shared by @Roxann. Speaking from a designer’s perspective I understand the situation you are in and here are a couple of processes I used to ensure content validity and provide a higher degree of reliability than just by developing the materials on my own. A key initial step was to develop the performance criteria combined with how these skills and behaviors were measured. This help outline the breadth and depth of the content areas. Then, in the content chunking sequence I also began developing the assessment scaffolding model to ensure participants would be able to try, remediate, try again and then progress onto ever increasing levels of difficultly the skills and behaviors begin developed. This cyclic process made the SME focus on several key points, content accuracy (can’t have an accurate test if content or process/procedures are not most current), content quality (chunking and remediation made review and reflection of materials mandatory), and alignment of content to current job/role practices providing successful learners who could demonstrate their new capabilities and be ready to enter the workflow. If speed is a concern, I highly recommend looking into using the DACUM process, I brought it into a couple of organizations I supported and found it very effective. Glad to chat if more details are of interest. - bill
Dear Bill and Roxan, thank you for your replies. I really benefited from it.